natural medicine

Showing posts with label INFORMATION RETRIEVAL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label INFORMATION RETRIEVAL. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

B - What makes a good policy paper

Whitty JM. What makes an academic paper useful for health policy? BMC Medicine 2015;13:301
(doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0544-8)

Getting relevant science and research into policy is essential. There are several barriers, but the easiest to reduce is making papers more relevant and accessible to policymakers. Opinion pieces backed up by footnotes are generally unusable for policy. Objective, rigorous, simply written original papers from multiple disciplines with data can be very helpful.
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-015-0544-8



Posted by bangpras at 7:46 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, PUBLISHING

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

B - Open access platforms for clinical trial data

Navar AM, Pencina MJ, Rymer JA, et al. Use of open access platforms for clinical trial data. (Letter). JAMA 2016;315(12):1283-1284
(doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2374)

Concerns over bias in clinical trial reporting have stimulated calls for more open data sharing. In response, multiple pharmaceutical companies have created mechanisms for investigators to access patient-level clinical trials data. Although more than 3,000 trials are available to investigators through open data platforms, only 15.5% had been requested by a limited number of researchers. Availability of shared clinical trial data should be promoted and use of individual patient data for validation studies encouraged.
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2504799
Posted by bangpras at 9:07 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL

Friday, June 26, 2015

B - Link rot

Perkel JM. The trouble with reference rot. Nature 2015;521(7550):111-112
(doi:10.1038/521111a)

Computer scientists are trying to shore up broken links in the scholarly literature. Herbert Van de Sompel and Martin Klein were interviewed by the author of this article on the work of the Hiberlink project. They have investigated the extent of reference rot on scholarly domains and their results show an alarming link rot ratio. They have also explored ways to mitigate it through more systematic web archiving practices and link decoration techniques.
http://www.nature.com/news/the-trouble-with-reference-rot-1.17465
Posted by bangpras at 9:13 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: EDITORIAL PROCESS, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL

Monday, March 30, 2015

B - Bibliographical support on quality of medical care

Pastori MM, Sarti M, Pons, M, et al. Assessing the impact of bibliographical support on the quality of medical care in patients admitted to an internal medicine service: a prospective clinical, open, randomised two-arm parallel study. Evidence-Based Medicine 2014;19:163-168
(doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110021)

Some research studies suggest that library services professionally provided have an impact on health outcomes for patients. This study confirmed the feasibility of bibliographical assistance in daily medical practice in an internal medicine service of a non-university hospital in Ticino Canton (Switzerland) . In particular, it was very useful and effective for patient care to have a dedicated physician that daily sends the bibliographical research results by email to the clinical team within 12 h after asking the focused question.
http://ebm.bmj.com/content/19/5/163.full
Posted by bangpras at 3:25 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

B - CoBRA: Citation of BioResources in journal Articles

Bravo E, Calzolari A, De Castro P, et al. Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA). BMC Medicine 2015;13:33
(doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0266-y)

Evaluating bioresources' use and impact requires that scientific publications accurately cite such resources. This article proposes for the first time a guideline for reporting bioresource use in research articles: the CoBRA, Citation of BioResources in journal Articles. Adopting this guideline will improve the quality of bioresource reporting and will allow their traceability in scientific publications, thus increasing the recognition of bioresources' value and relevance to research.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/33
Posted by bangpras at 4:58 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: EDITORIAL PROCESS, INFORMATION RETRIEVAL

Monday, September 22, 2014

B - Wikipedia citations in journal articles

Tohidinasab F, Jamali HR. Why and where Wikipedia is cited in journal articles? Journal of Scientometric Research 2013;2(3):231-238
(doi: 10.4103/2320-0057.135415)

This research aimed to identify the motivations for citation to Wikipedia in scientific papers. Also, the number of citation to Wikipedia, location of citation, type of citing papers, subject of citing and cited articles were determined and compared in different subject fields. Results showed that there are 20 motivations for citing Wikipedia and the most frequent of them are providing general information and definition, facts and figures. Citations to Wikipedia often appear in the introduction or introductory sections of papers. Computer sciences, internet and chemistry are the most cited subjects. The use of Wikipedia in articles is increasing both in terms of quantity and diversity
http://www.jscires.org/article.asp?issn=2320-0057;year=2013;volume=2;issue=3;spage=231;epage=238;aulast=Tohidinasab
Posted by bangpras at 6:48 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Followers

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2016 (49)
    • ▼  June (18)
      • B - Scientists' participation in public debates
      • B - Writing for lay audiences
      • B - Medical journalism
      • B - Replicating psychology studies
      • B - Sex and gender equity in research: SAGER guide...
      • B - Rewarding reviewers
      • B - What makes a good policy paper
      • B - Post-publication peer review
      • B - OA and knowledge translation
      • B - Rule violations
      • B - Sharing clinical trial data
      • B - Statistical reporting errors in psychology
      • B - Public registry of competing interests
      • B - Reviewer fatigue?
      • B - OA publishing trend analysis
      • B - Gender analysis in health system research
      • B - The Flesch Reading Ease measure
      • B - Open access impact
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2015 (74)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2014 (27)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
  • ►  2006 (19)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2005 (49)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (11)

About Me

bangpras
View my complete profile
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.